Iranian Veterinary Journal

Iranian Veterinary Journal

The effect of positioning on renal dimension in healthy dogs by ultrasonography

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 DVM Graduated from Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
    Ultrasonography is an optional method to evaluate the urinary system, which can be used to check the tissue and dimensional changes of kidneys. This technique is used to diagnose kidney diseases and changes in kidney size following treatment. The measurement of kidney can make it possible to observe more length of renal vessels and diverticula, from the dorsal view or taking transverse views. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of positioning on measurement of renal dimension and their correlation to length of lumbar (L) vertebrae and abdominal aortic (AO) diameter by ultrasonography. The survey was conducted on twenty natives, adult healthy dogs. Renal length (L), width (W), height (H) and volume were measured in right lateral recumbency (RLR) and dorsal recumbency (DR) for the left kidney (LK), and in left lateral recumbency (LLR) and (DR) for the right kidney (RK) by ultrasonography. The aortic diameter and Length of the L5 and L6 were measured by ultrasonography and L2, L3 and L4 by radiography. Ratios were also calculated between dimensions of kidneys and lumbar vertebrae. Based on the paired sample t test, length and width of both kidneys were significantly larger than DR in RLR and LLR, while the height of the right kidney was significantly smaller than DR in LLR. There was no significant difference between the heights of left kidney in both positioning. There was a direct significant correlation between renal dimension with AO and vertebral length. Kidney length had the best Pearson correlation coefficient. There was no significant difference between renal dimension ratio and vertebral length. The ratio means of both left and right kidney length to L2 was obtained, 2.2 and 2.3, to L5, 2 and 2.1 and to AO, 7.3 and 7.3, respectively. In conclusion, the findings of the present study showed that the imaging mode had an effect on kidney dimensions. Therefore, it is necessary to compare kidney dimensions with the same imaging mode, in repeated ultrasonography of an animal.  
Keywords

Subjects


Barella, G., Lodi, M., Sabbadin, L. A., & Faverzani, S. (2012). A new method for ultrasonographic measurement of kidney size in healthy dogs. Journal of Ultrasound, 15(3),186-191.
Buchanan, J. W. (2000). Vertebral scale system to measure canine hearts size in radiographs. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, 30(2).379-393.
Carrico, C. W., & Zerin, J. M. (1996). Sonographic measurement of renal length in children: does the position of the patient matter? Pediatric Radiology, 26(8), 553-555.
Chaudhary, S., & Paudel, S. K. (2020). Estimation of normal kidney length in clinically healthy adult mongrel dogs using ultrasonography. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, 5(1), 119-123.
d'Anjou, M. A. (2008). Kidney and Ureters, In: Atlas of small animal ultrasonography. Eds: Penninck DP, d'Anjou MA, First edition, Blackwell Science, Iowa, pp: 339-364.
De Sanctis, T. J., Connolly, S. A., & Bramson, R. (1998). Effect of patient position on sonographically measured renal length in neonates, infants, and children. American Journal of Radiology, 170, 1381-1383.
Finco, D. R. (1971). Radiologic estimation of kidney size in the dog. Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association, 159(8), 995-1002.
Ghadiri, A. R., Avizeh, R., Baniadam, A., & Samimi, Sh. (2024). Evaluation of the correlation between renal dimentions and volume in ultrasonography and real measurement in dogs. Iranian Veterinary Journal, 20(2), 74-81.
Ghadiri, A. R., Samimi, S., Avizeh, R., & Baniadam, A. (2008). Comparison between ultrasonigraphy and direct measurement in determining the size and volume of kidneys in dogs. 15th Iranian Veterinary Congress, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/59172.
Ghadiri, A., Mosallanejad, B., Pourmahdi Borujeni, M., & Bashiri, S. (2015). Ultrasonographic evaluation of correlation between renal, prostatic gland and testicular dimensions in healthy dogs. Iranian Veterinary Journal, 11(3), 80-86.
Hansson, K., Haggstrom, J., Kvart, C., & Lord, P. (2002). Left atrial to aortic root indices using two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in Cavalier King Charles spaniels with and without left atrial enlargement. Journal of Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, 43,568–575.
Hawthorne, A. J., Booles, D., Nugent, P.A., Gettinby, G., & Wilkinson, J. (2004). Body-weight changes during growth in puppies of different breeds. Journal of Nutrition, 134(8), 2027-2030.
Kealy, J. K. (2011). The urinary system. In: Kealy, J. K., McAllister, H. (Eds). Diagnostic Radiology and Ultrasonography of the Dog and Cat. Fourth edition, Mosby. St. Louis, Missouri, pp: 112-117.
Mareschal, A., d'Anjou, M. A., Moreau, M., & Alexander, K. (2007). Ultrasonographic measurement of kidney-to-aorta ratio as a method of estimating renal size in dogs. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, 48(5), 434-438.
Martinez, M., Soler, M., Laredo, F. G., Belda, E., & Agut, A. (2022). Ultrasonographic assessment of the renal size using a kidney length to vertebral body length ratio in cats. Frontiers in Veterinary Imaging. 3, 1-12.
Michel, S. C., Forster, I., Seifert, B., Willi, U. V., & Huisman, T. A. G. M. (2004). Renal dimensions measured by ultrasonography in children: variations as a function of the imaging plane and patient position. European Radiology, 14(8), 1508-1512.
Nyland, T. G., Widmer, W. R., & Matton, J. S. (2015). Urinary tract. In: Matton, J. S, Nyland, T. G. (Eds.) Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound. Third edition, Elsevier St. Louis, Missouri, pp: 557-560.
Penninck, D., & dAnjiou, M. A. (2008). Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography.Wiley-Blackwell, Second edition, pp: 143-156.
Thrall, D. E. (2018). Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. Seventh Edition, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri, pp: 823-845.