The ultrasonographic pregnancy diagnosis and reproductive evaluation in under 4 month pregnancy in river buffalo in-vitro

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 DVM Graduate, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Naghadeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Naghadeh, Iran

Abstract

    This study aimed to evaluate the sizes and dimensions of fetuses and uteruses in under-four-month pregnant river buffalos through ultrasonography by determining their standard values. For the ultrasonographic evaluation of uteruses in under-four-month gravid cows, 24 uteruses of eight age groups were collected from a slaughterhouse and then transported to a laboratory. Each uterus was placed inside a 40-liter water bowl (water bath) and then examined with probes of 6.5 and 8 MHz. The fetal eyeball diameter, skull diameter, lateral and dorsal cotyledon diameters were reported 0.55±0.30 cm, 1.25±0.50 cm, 1.50±1.33 cm, and 1.00±1.10 cm, respectively, in a 47.79±3.41-day-old fetus. The fetal eyeball diameter, skull diameter, lateral and dorsal cotyledon diameters were reported 0.65±0.12 cm, 2.35±1.20 cm, 2.30±1.21 cm, and 2.50±0.65 cm, respectively, in a 76.34±3.4-day-old fetus. The fetal eyeball diameter, skull diameter, lateral and dorsal cotyledon diameters were reported 1.60±0.12 cm, 4.50±1.80 cm, 3.08±0.50 cm, and 3.03±0.75 cm, respectively, in a 105.7±3.2-day-old fetus.  In general, the research results indicated the critical role of ultrasonography as an early diagnostic method for determining the sizes and dimensions of fetuses and uteruses in under-four-month pregnant river buffalos and obtaining their standard values.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmed, WM., Hanafi, EM., Ali, AH., Zaabal, M., & Elkhadrawy, H. (2015). Some Managemental and Reproductive Aspects in Relation to Subsequent Fertility in Transitional Cows. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23(11):2748-55.
Ali, A. (2004). Effect of gestational age and fetal position on the possibility and accuracy of ultrasonographic fetal gender determination in dairy cattle. Reproduction in domestic animals, 39(3):190-4.
AssisNeto, AC., Pereira, F., Santos, TCd., Ambrosio, C., Leiser, R., & Miglino, M. (2010). Morphophysical Recording of Bovine Conceptus (bos indicus) and Placenta from Days 20 to 70 of Pregnancy. Reproduction in domestic animals, 45(5):760-72.
Bertolini, M., Mason, JB., Beam, SW., Carneiro, GF., Sween, ML., & Kominek et al. (2002). Morphology and morphometry of in vivo-and in vitro-produced bovine concepti from early pregnancy to term and association with high birth weights. Theriogenology, 58(5):973-94.
Dufour, S., Durocher, J., Dubuc, J., Dendukuri, N., Hassan, S., & Buczinski, S. (2017). Bayesian estimation of sensitivity and specificity of a milk pregnancy-associated glycoprotein-based ELISA and of transrectal ultrasonographic exam for diagnosis of pregnancy at 28–45 days following breeding in dairy cows. Preventive veterinary medicine,140: 122-133.
Kähn, W., & Volkmann, D. (2004). Veterinary reproductive ultrasonography: Schlütersche.
Kähn, W. (1989). Sonographic fetometry in the bovine. Theriogenology, 31(5):1105-21.
Kramer, R., Smith, D., Rupp, G., Griffin, D., & Funston, R. (2016). Estimation of calving date in beef cattle with real-time ultrasound. The Professional Animal Scientist, 32: 322-327.
Labhubhai, B.H. (2010). Induction and synchronization of estrus in postpasture anoestrus kankrej coes: Anand agricultural university, Anand.
Lamb, C. (2004). Reproductive ultrasound for management of beef cattle. Reproductive Management Course Appendix, 1-18.
Lazim, EH., Alrawi, H.M., & Aziz, D.M. (2016). Relationship between gestational age and transabdominal ultrasonographic measurements of fetus and uterus during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of gestation in cows. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, 5: 326-330.
López-Gatius, F., Andreu-Vázquez, C., Mur-Novales, R., Cabrera, V., & Hunter, R. (2017). The dilemma of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. A review of practical prospects. Livestock Science, 197: 12-16.
Medan, M.S., & El-Aty, A.A. (2010). Advances in ultrasonography and its applications in domestic ruminants and other farm animals reproduction. Journal of Advanced Research, 1(2):123-8.
Mee, J., Buckley, F., Ryan, D., & Dillon, P. (2009). Pre‐breeding Ovaro–Uterine Ultrasonography and its Relationship with First Service Pregnancy Rate in Seasonal‐Calving Dairy Herds. Reproduction in domestic animals, 44: 331-337.
Munde, V. (2006). Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Early Pregnancy in Buffalo: MAFSU, Nagpur.
Noakes, D.E., Parkinson, T.J.,  & England, G.C. (2018).  Arthur's Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics-E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences.
Patel, J.A., (2004). Management of repeat breeding holstein friesian cows through ultrasonography, blood profile and hormonal therapy under Subtropical climate: Anand Agricultural University, Anand.
Pathan, M., & Pampori, Z. (2011). Real-Time Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Tool in Bovine Reproduction. feedback, 6(2):88.
Wagener, K., Gabler, C., & Drillich, M. (2017). A review of the ongoing discussion about definition, diagnosis and pathomechanism of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 94: 21-30.