Comparison of two methods for monitoring antibiotic residues in broiler carcasses

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Food Hygiene and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 DVM Graduate, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

4 PhD Student of Food Hygiene and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

5 Professor, DepartmentFood Hygiene and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

    This study was performed to compare the sensitivity of seven plate methods and commercial kits for the detection of antibiotics in vitro and in poultry carcasses. In the first step, different concentrations of five commonly used antibiotics in poultry breeding were prepared and the sensitivity of both methods in antibiotic residue detection was evaluated. Subsequently, 20 days old broilers were divided into 5 groups. After an adaptation period and feeding non-antibiotic diet, groups were treated with therapeutic doses of Oxytetracycline, Enrofloxacin, Florfenicol, and Fosfomycin through drinking water. One group was considered as a control. At antibiotic discontinuation day (day 0) and days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 thereafter, 3 chicks from each group were slaughtered and thigh muscle, liver and kidney were sampled and residual antibiotics were evaluated by both methods. The results showed that sensitivity of commercial kits was higher in in-vitro condition than that of poultry carcass. In the seven plate method, the residuals were more detectable in the liver and kidney. The commercial kit was able to detect antibiotics only up to 24 hours, after which almost all specimens were negative. The seven plate method was positive for most of the specimens up to three days after discontinuation.  This study showed that the efficacy of the seven-plate method was more than commercial kits, and in order to increase the efficiency of detection methods, it is recommended to perform it on the liver and kidney of four carcasses from each herd (total of 8 samples). If at least four samples are positive, the herd is considered as infected and the HPLC method is used to confirm the specimens.

Keywords


Adewuyi, G.O., Olatoye, O.I., Abafe, A.O., Otokpa, M.O., & Nkukut, N.K. (2011). High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Methods for Evaluation of Two Antibiotic Residues in Liver and Muscle of Broilers in Ibadan City, Southern Nigeria. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, 11(6), 1–4.
Amjad, H., Iqbal, J., & Naeem, M. (2005). Analysis of Some Residual Antibiotics in Muscle, Kidney and Liver Samples of Broiler Chicken by Various Methods. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, 42(4), 223–231.
Apata, D. (2009). Antibiotic resistance in poultry. International Journal of Poultry Sciences, 8, 404–408.
Bogaerts, R., & Wolf, F. (1980). A standardized method for the detection of residues of antibacterial substances in fresh meat. Fleischwirtschaft, 60, 672–674.
Bruinsma, J. (2003). World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Cantwell, H., & Okeeffe, M. (2005). Evaluation of the premi® test and comparison with thr One-plate test for the detection of antimicrobials in kidney. Food Additives and Contaminants, 23 (2), 120- 125.
Codex Alimentarius. (2018). Maximum resdue limits (MRL) and risk management recommendations (RMRs) for residues of veterinary drugs in foods. Pp: 1-46.
Er, B., Onurdağ, F.K., Demirhan, B., Özgacar, S.Ö., Öktem, A.B., & Abbasoğlu, U. (2013). creening of Quinolone Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat and Beef Sold in the Markets of Ankara, Turkey. Poultry Sciences, 92, 2212–2215.
Gaudin, V., Maris, P., Fuselier, R., Ribouchon, J.L., Cadieu, N., & Rault, A. (2004). Validation of a microbiological method: the STAR protocol, a five-plate test, for the screening of antibiotic residues in milk. Food Additives and Contaminants, 21 (5), 422–433.
Gaudin, V., Hedou, C., Rault A., &  Verdon E. (2010). Validation of a Five Plate Test, the STAR protocol, for the screening of antibiotic residues in muscle from different animal species according to European Decision 2002/657/EC, Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 27 (7), 935-952.
Gondová, Z., Kožárová, I., Poláková, Z., &Mad’arová, M. (2014). Comparison of Four Microbiological Inhibition Tests for the Screening of Antimicrobial Residues in the Tissues of Food-Producing Animals. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13 (4), 3521.
Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., esconi, V.C., &Troy, D. (2014). Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Science, 98, 561- 568.
Hind, E.A., Adil, S.M., &El-Rade, S.A. (2014). Screening of Antibiotic Residues in Poultry Liver, Kidney and Muscle in Khartoum State, Sudan. Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 2(3), 116–122.
Hosseinkhan nazer, A., Shekarforosh, S.S., &Ghaneei, K. (1996). Using F.P.T. Method to Assess Antibiotic Residues in Lamb Carcass. Animal Science Journal, 8 (1), 186- 189.
Javadi, A., Mirzaie, H., & Khatibi, S.A. (2009). Effect of roasting process on antibiotic residues in edible tissues of poultry by FPT method. Journal of Animal and veterinary Advances 8(12), 2468-2472.
Kabir, J., Umoh, V.J., Audu-okoh, E., Umoh, J.U., & Kwaga, J.K.P. (2004). Veterinary drug use in poultry farms and determination of antimicrobial drug residues in commercial eggs and slaughtered chicken in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Food Control, 15, 99–105.
Kapoor, G., Saigal, S., & Elongavan, A. (2017). Action and resistance mechanisms of antibiotics: A guide for clinicians. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 33(3), 300–305.
Kavanagh, F. (1963). Analytical microbiology. New York and London: Academic Press.
Kaya, S.E., & Filazi, A. (2010). Determination of antibiotic residues in milk samples. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 16: 31-35.
Koenen-Dierick, K., & De Beer, J.O. (1998). Optimization of an antibiotic residue screening test, based on inhibition of Bacillus subtilis BGA, with experimental design. Food Additives and Contaminants, 12, 77–82.
Kirbis, A. (2007). Microbiological screening method for detection of aminoglycosides, β-lactames, macrolides, tetracyclines and quinolones in meat samples. Slov Vet Res, 44(1/2), 11-18.
Kilinc, B., Meyer, M., & Hilge, V. (2007). Evaluation of the EEC four-plate test and Premi test for screeningantibiotic residues in trout (Salmo trutta). International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42, 625–628.
Lohajova, L., Nagy, J., Rozanska, H., Popelkai, P., & Jevinova, P. (2006). Suitability of STAR and Premi® test for the detection of Amoxycilin residues in laying hens. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 50, 367- 371.
Marshall, B.M., & Levy, S.B. (2011). Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 24(4), 718–733.
Mehdizadeh, S., Kazeranim H.R., & Jamshidi, A. (2010). Screening of chloramphenicol residues in broiler chickens slaughtered in an industrial poultry abattoir in Mashhad, Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Sciene and Technology, 2, 25–32.
Muaz, KH., Riaz, M., Akhtar, S., Park, S., & Ismail, A. (2018). Antibiotic Residues in Chicken Meat: Global Prevalence, Threats, and Decontamination Strategies: A Review. Journal of Food Protection, 81 (4), 619–627
Myllyniemi, A.L., Nuotio, L., Lindfors, E., Rannikko, R., Niemi, A., & Backman, C. (2001). A microbial six-plate method for the identification of certain antibiotic groups in incurred kidney and muscle samples. Analyst, 126, 641–6.
National Veterinary Instructions. (1395). Qualitative detection of antibiotic residues in milk using agar diffusion method.
Okerman, L. De Wasch, K. & Van Hoof, J. (1998). Detection of antibiotics in muscle tissue with microbiological inhibition tests: effects of the matrix. Analyst, 123, 2361–2365.
Okerman, L. Croubels, S. Cherlet, M. De Wasch, K. De Backer, P. & Van Hoof, J. (2004). Evaluation and establishing the performance of different screening tests for tetracycline residues in animal tissues. Food Addition Contamination, 21, 145–153.
Okerman, L. Noppe, H. Cornet, V. & Dezutter, L. (2007). Microbiological detection of 10 quinolone antibiotic residues and its application to artificially contaminated poultry samples. Food Additives and Contaminants, 24(3), 252–257.
Pikkemaat, M.G., Rapallini, M.L.B.A., Oostra-van Dijk, S., & Elferink, J.W.A. (2009). Comparison of three microbial screening methods for antibiotics using routine monitoring samples. Analytica Chimica Acta, 637, 298–304.
Pikkemaat, M.G., Rapallini, M.L.B.A., Zuidema, T., Elferink, J.W.A., Oostra-van Dijka, S., & Driessen-van Lankveld, W.D.M. (2010). Screening methods for the detection of antibiotic residues in slaughter animals: comparison of the European Union Four-Plate Test, the Nouws Antibiotic Test and the Premi®Test (applied to muscle and kidney). Food Additives and Contaminants, 28 (1), 26–34.
Popelka, P., Nagy, J., Popelka, P., Marcincák, S., Jevinová, P., & Hussein, K. (2003). Comparison of BsDA and Premi® test sensitivity to penicillin standards in poultry meat and after administration of amuril PLV.SOL. Solia Vetericaria, 47, 3.
Reyes-Herrera, I., Schneider, M.J., Cole, K., Farnell, M.B., Blore, P.J., & Donoghue, D.J. (2005). Concentrations of Antibiotic Residues Vary between Different Edible Muscle Tissues in Poultry. Journal of Food Protection, 68 (10), 2217–2219.
Salehzadeh, F., Salehzadeh, A., Rokni, N., Madani, R., & Golchinefar, F. (2007). Enrofloxacin Residue in Chicken Tissues from Tehran Slaughterhouses in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 6(4), 409–413.
Salehzadeh, F., Madani, R., Salehzadeh, A., Rokni, N., & Golchinefar, F. (2006). Oxytetracycline Residue in Chicken Tissues from Tehran Slaughterhouses in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5(4), 377–381.
San Martin, B., Cornejo, J., Lapierre, L., Iraguen, D., Perez, F., Hidalgo, H. et al. (2009). Withdrawal time of four pharmaceutical formulations of enrofloxacin in poultry according to different maximum residues limits. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 33, 246–251.